Technology and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Right from lie recognition tools analyzed at the edge to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being employed in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to understand these systems and to follow their legal right for cover.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from being able to access the stations of safeguards. It further argues that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are regimented by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double result: find more when they assist with expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult intended for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.